CVE-2026-98548·Kernel vulnerability
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: discard the rest of the packet on a stale-cookie error When an association is in COOKIE-ECHOED state and the peer sends a bundled [ERROR(Stale Cookie)][DATA] packet from one of its non-primary addresses, processing the ERROR chunk takes the non-fatal stale-cookie retry path sctp_sf_do_5_2_6_stale(), which queues SCTP_CMD_DEL_NON_PRIMARY while keeping the association alive. sctp_cmd_del_non_primary() removes every non-primary transport - including the very transport this packet arrived on, which is still referenced by the receive lookup and shared by all chunks of the packet via chunk->transport. sctp_assoc_rm_peer() does redirect asoc->peer.last_data_from away from the removed transport, but right afterwards the bundled DATA chunk makes sctp_assoc_bh_rcv() re-register asoc->peer.last_data_from = chunk->transport unconditionally, undoing the redirection with the just-removed transport. Once the packet is done, the receive reference is dropped and the transport is RCU-freed, while the surviving association keeps the dangling last_data_from. A later FWD-TSN (or the delayed SACK timer) makes sctp_gen_sack() dereference it (->param_flags and friends), and sctp_make_sack()/sctp_outq_select_transport() may write to the freed object and link it into the live transport list. This is a use-after-free triggerable by any malicious SCTP peer (or a local unprivileged user acting as one) with no capabilities required: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in sctp_do_sm+0x498a/0x5660 Read of size 4 at addr ffff88800e1e356c by task poc/115 Call Trace: sctp_do_sm <- sctp_assoc_bh_rcv <- sctp_inq_push <- sctp_rcv <- ip_protocol_deliver_rcu <- ip_rcv Allocated: sctp_transport_new <- sctp_assoc_add_peer <- sctp_process_init (INIT-ACK processing) Freed: kfree <- sctp_transport_destroy_rcu <- rcu_core (call_rcu queued by sctp_transport_put at end of sctp_rcv) The buggy address is located 364 bytes inside of freed 1024-byte region [ffff88800e1e3400, ffff88800e1e3800), cache kmalloc-1k Note that commit 03a9d10ecf71 ("sctp: drop a chunk if its transport was removed") only covers the window between the receive lookup and the chunk processing (e.g. an ASCONF DEL-IP racing the socket backlog); here the transport is removed *while* the packet is being processed, by an earlier chunk of the same packet, so the drop in sctp_inq_push() does not reach this path. Verified with the bundled [ERROR(Stale Cookie)][DATA] + FWD-TSN reproducer: the KASAN report above still fires with that commit applied, and is gone with this patch on top. Fix it by discarding the rest of the packet on this path, as suggested by Xin. After the stale-cookie ERROR has sent the association back to COOKIE-WAIT and removed the non-primary transports, the remaining chunks of the packet can only run against the restarted handshake while referencing the removed arrival transport through chunk->transport: besides the last_data_from registration above, sctp_cmd_setup_t2() and the sctp_make_*() reply builders would also copy that pointer into association-lifetime state that sctp_assoc_rm_peer() has already sanitized. Let the peer retransmit them, in line with what sctp_inq_push() does for chunks whose transport was removed before processing.
- Severity
- critical
- Software
- Kernel
- Fixed in
- 5.10.271, 5.15.222, 6.1.189, 6.6.158, 6.12.112, 6.18.55, 7.2.9, 7.3
- Published
How likely is exploitation
FIRST's Exploit Prediction Scoring System puts the probability of this CVE being exploited in the next 30 days at 0.21% — higher than 11% of all published CVEs. EPSS is an independent forecast of exploitation, not a severity rating: it says nothing about how much damage a successful attack does, which is what a CVSS score measures.
Read the two together. CVE-2026-98548 scores 9.8 on CVSS, so a successful attack would be serious — but at 0.21%, almost nobody is currently attempting it. That is a different situation from a flaw under mass exploitation, and it is usually the difference between patching on your next maintenance window and patching tonight.
How to fix this CVE
Update your Linux kernel to one of the fixed stable releases: 5.10.271, 5.15.222, 6.1.189, 6.6.158, 6.12.112, 6.18.55, or 7.2.9 depending on your current kernel branch. This critical use-after-free vulnerability in SCTP packet processing can be exploited by malicious peers to cause kernel memory corruption. Install your distribution's patched kernel package rather than jumping to mainline to maintain stability and vendor support.
sudo dnf update kernel kernel-devel kernel-headersDefensia detects this vulnerability
How to check if you are affected
- Step 1: Check your current kernel version: uname -r
- Step 2: Verify SCTP module is loaded: lsmod | grep sctp (confirms if SCTP is in use)
- Step 3: Search kernel logs for KASAN or use-after-free warnings: sudo dmesg | grep -i 'use-after-free\|kasan'
- Step 4: After patching, reboot and confirm new kernel version: sudo reboot && uname -r
FAQ
What is CVE-2026-98548?
This is a critical use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel's SCTP (Stream Control Transmission Protocol) implementation. When a peer sends a bundled ERROR packet with a stale cookie followed by DATA chunks, the kernel incorrectly maintains references to a transport that has been freed, leading to memory corruption and potential code execution.
Is CVE-2026-98548 being actively exploited?
No active exploitation has been reported in the wild. However, the vulnerability requires no special privileges and can be triggered by any malicious SCTP peer or local unprivileged user, making it a high-risk threat if exploitation techniques become public.
What versions of Kernel are affected by CVE-2026-98548?
All kernel versions before the fixed releases are vulnerable: 5.10 before 5.10.271, 5.15 before 5.15.222, 6.1 before 6.1.189, 6.6 before 6.6.158, 6.12 before 6.12.112, 6.18 before 6.18.55, and 7.2 before 7.2.9.
How do I check if my server is vulnerable to CVE-2026-98548?
Run 'uname -r' to get your kernel version, then compare it against the fixed versions listed above for your kernel branch. If your version is older than the corresponding fixed release, your system is vulnerable.
Does Defensia detect CVE-2026-98548?
Yes — Defensia's CVE advisory scanner compares installed package versions against the NVD database. If the Linux kernel is installed on a monitored server, CVE-2026-98548 will appear in your dashboard with remediation steps.
Related Kernel CVEs
References
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/1cd246b214dc9acf4e2f11d58c035e1e672fe7d2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/4498467a8af06cfa3d71cb04bd7c4170dec8f449
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/6df536c5acbc0abd6f119d02e24f4a2ed97707f4
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/854c053c71459f8db7ef07db9cfa4eec5f5206f2
- https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/965e21ea16acb394d5e5801998ca9b0adc669665
Track CVEs across your fleet automatically
Defensia scans your Linux servers and tells you exactly which ones are running vulnerable versions — including CVE-2026-98548. Free for 1 server.
Get started free