high CVSS 7.1

CVE-2024-56597·Kernel vulnerability

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: jfs: fix shift-out-of-bounds in dbSplit When dmt_budmin is less than zero, it causes errors in the later stages. Added a check to return an error beforehand in dbAllocCtl itself.

Severity
high
Software
Kernel
Fixed in
6.12.5
Published
2024-12-27

Affected versions

From: 6.7

Until: 6.12.5

Fixed in: 6.12.5

How to fix this CVE

Update your Linux kernel to version 6.12.5 or later to remediate CVE-2024-56597, a memory allocation vulnerability in the JFS filesystem driver. This vulnerability allows local users with limited privileges to trigger a denial-of-service condition or potentially read sensitive kernel memory through improper bounds checking in the database block allocation routine. Kernel updates should be applied promptly and followed by a system reboot to activate the patched code.

sudo dnf update kernel kernel-devel && sudo reboot

Defensia detects this vulnerability

How to check if you are affected

  1. Check your current kernel version: uname -r | grep -E '^6\.(7|8|9|10|11|12\.[0-4])'
  2. Verify JFS filesystem is in use: mount | grep -i jfs or df -t jfs
  3. Review kernel logs for allocation errors: sudo journalctl -k | grep -i 'jfs\|dbSplit\|shift\|out of bounds'
  4. Confirm kernel patch level after update: uname -r should show 6.12.5 or higher

FAQ

What is CVE-2024-56597?

CVE-2024-56597 is a kernel vulnerability in the JFS filesystem driver where insufficient validation of memory allocation parameters can cause a shift-out-of-bounds error, potentially leading to denial-of-service or unauthorized memory disclosure by local attackers.

Is CVE-2024-56597 being actively exploited?

No, CVE-2024-56597 is not listed in the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog and no public exploits are currently available.

What versions of Kernel are affected by CVE-2024-56597?

Linux kernel versions 6.7 through 6.12.4 are affected. The vulnerability is fixed in kernel 6.12.5 and later.

How do I check if my server is vulnerable to CVE-2024-56597?

Run 'uname -r' and compare output against 6.12.5—if your version is between 6.7 and 6.12.4 inclusive, and you use JFS filesystems (check with 'mount | grep jfs'), your system is vulnerable.

Does Defensia detect CVE-2024-56597?

Yes — Defensia's CVE advisory scanner compares installed package versions against the NVD database. If Kernel is installed on a monitored server, CVE-2024-56597 will appear in your dashboard with remediation steps.

Related Kernel CVEs

CVE-2024-42256CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry When a subrequest is marked for needing retry, netfs will call cifs_prepare_write() which will make cifs repick the server for the op before renegotiating credits; it then calls cifs_issue_write() which invokes smb2_async_writev() - which re-repicks the server. If a different server is then selected, this causes the increment of server->in_flight to happen against one record and the decrement to happen against another, leading to misaccounting. Fix this by just removing the repick code in smb2_async_writev(). As this is only called from netfslib-driven code, cifs_prepare_write() should always have been called first, and so server should never be NULL and the preparatory step is repeated in the event that we do a retry. The problem manifests as a warning looking something like: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 72896 at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97 smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs] ... RIP: 0010:smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs] ... smb2_writev_callback+0x334/0x560 [cifs] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x77a/0x11b0 [cifs] kthread+0x187/0x1d0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Which may be triggered by a number of different xfstests running against an Azure server in multichannel mode. generic/249 seems the most repeatable, but generic/215, generic/249 and generic/308 may also show it.
CVE-2024-36031CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: keys: Fix overwrite of key expiration on instantiation The expiry time of a key is unconditionally overwritten during instantiation, defaulting to turn it permanent. This causes a problem for DNS resolution as the expiration set by user-space is overwritten to TIME64_MAX, disabling further DNS updates. Fix this by restoring the condition that key_set_expiry is only called when the pre-parser sets a specific expiry.
CVE-2024-38612CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path The error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the genl_unregister_family() isn't called. This issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 ("ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support"), and commit 5559cea2d5aa ("ipv6: sr: fix possible use-after-free and null-ptr-deref") replaced unregister_pernet_subsys() with genl_unregister_family() in this error path.
CVE-2024-38623CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: Use variable length array instead of fixed size Should fix smatch warning: ntfs_set_label() error: __builtin_memcpy() 'uni->name' too small (20 vs 256)
CVE-2021-47548CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port() The if statement: if (port >= DSAF_GE_NUM) return; limits the value of port less than DSAF_GE_NUM (i.e., 8). However, if the value of port is 6 or 7, an array overflow could occur: port_rst_off = dsaf_dev->mac_cb[port]->port_rst_off; because the length of dsaf_dev->mac_cb is DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM (i.e., 6). To fix this possible array overflow, we first check port and if it is greater than or equal to DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM, the function returns.

References

Track CVEs across your fleet automatically

Defensia scans your Linux servers and tells you exactly which ones are running vulnerable versions — including CVE-2024-56597. Free for 1 server.

Get started free