high CVSS 7.8

CVE-2024-50262·Kernel vulnerability

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Fix out-of-bounds write in trie_get_next_key() trie_get_next_key() allocates a node stack with size trie->max_prefixlen, while it writes (trie->max_prefixlen + 1) nodes to the stack when it has full paths from the root to leaves. For example, consider a trie with max_prefixlen is 8, and the nodes with key 0x00/0, 0x00/1, 0x00/2, ... 0x00/8 inserted. Subsequent calls to trie_get_next_key with _key with .prefixlen = 8 make 9 nodes be written on the node stack with size 8.

Severity
high
Software
Kernel
Fixed in
6.11.7
Published
2024-11-09

Affected versions

From: 6.7

Until: 6.11.7

Fixed in: 6.11.7

How to fix this CVE

Update your Linux kernel to version 6.11.7 or later to patch the out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the eBPF trie implementation. This vulnerability allows local privileged users to corrupt kernel memory by exploiting improper stack allocation in the trie_get_next_key() function. Immediate patching is recommended for systems with kernel versions 6.7 through 6.11.6 that run eBPF-based applications or have unprivileged eBPF enabled.

sudo dnf update kernel kernel-devel

Defensia detects this vulnerability

How to check if you are affected

  1. Check your kernel version: uname -r — if it shows 6.7.x through 6.11.6, you are vulnerable
  2. Verify eBPF is enabled: cat /boot/config-$(uname -r) | grep CONFIG_BPF — if set to 'y', the vulnerable code path is compiled
  3. Check for eBPF program activity: bpftool prog list — if trie-based eBPF programs are loaded, exploitation surface exists
  4. After patching, confirm: uname -r should show 6.11.7 or later, and verify no memory corruption errors in dmesg during eBPF operations

FAQ

What is CVE-2024-50262?

CVE-2024-50262 is a kernel memory corruption vulnerability in Linux's eBPF trie data structure implementation. The trie_get_next_key() function allocates insufficient stack space, causing it to write one additional node beyond the allocated buffer when traversing full-depth trie paths, leading to kernel memory corruption.

Is CVE-2024-50262 being actively exploited?

No. This vulnerability is not listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog, and no public exploits are currently available. However, it requires local access with elevated privileges to trigger.

What versions of Kernel are affected by CVE-2024-50262?

Linux kernel versions 6.7 through 6.11.6 are vulnerable. The fix is included in kernel 6.11.7 and later stable releases.

How do I check if my server is vulnerable to CVE-2024-50262?

Run 'uname -r' and check if your kernel version falls between 6.7 and 6.11.6. Also verify eBPF is enabled with 'cat /boot/config-$(uname -r) | grep CONFIG_BPF' — if it returns 'CONFIG_BPF=y', your system is vulnerable.

Does Defensia detect CVE-2024-50262?

Yes — Defensia's CVE advisory scanner compares installed package versions against the NVD database. If the Linux kernel is installed on a monitored server, CVE-2024-50262 will appear in your dashboard with remediation steps.

Related Kernel CVEs

CVE-2024-42256CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: cifs: Fix server re-repick on subrequest retry When a subrequest is marked for needing retry, netfs will call cifs_prepare_write() which will make cifs repick the server for the op before renegotiating credits; it then calls cifs_issue_write() which invokes smb2_async_writev() - which re-repicks the server. If a different server is then selected, this causes the increment of server->in_flight to happen against one record and the decrement to happen against another, leading to misaccounting. Fix this by just removing the repick code in smb2_async_writev(). As this is only called from netfslib-driven code, cifs_prepare_write() should always have been called first, and so server should never be NULL and the preparatory step is repeated in the event that we do a retry. The problem manifests as a warning looking something like: WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 72896 at fs/smb/client/smb2ops.c:97 smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs] ... RIP: 0010:smb2_add_credits+0x3f0/0x9e0 [cifs] ... smb2_writev_callback+0x334/0x560 [cifs] cifs_demultiplex_thread+0x77a/0x11b0 [cifs] kthread+0x187/0x1d0 ret_from_fork+0x34/0x60 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 Which may be triggered by a number of different xfstests running against an Azure server in multichannel mode. generic/249 seems the most repeatable, but generic/215, generic/249 and generic/308 may also show it.
CVE-2024-36031CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: keys: Fix overwrite of key expiration on instantiation The expiry time of a key is unconditionally overwritten during instantiation, defaulting to turn it permanent. This causes a problem for DNS resolution as the expiration set by user-space is overwritten to TIME64_MAX, disabling further DNS updates. Fix this by restoring the condition that key_set_expiry is only called when the pre-parser sets a specific expiry.
CVE-2024-38612CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv6: sr: fix invalid unregister error path The error path of seg6_init() is wrong in case CONFIG_IPV6_SEG6_LWTUNNEL is not defined. In that case if seg6_hmac_init() fails, the genl_unregister_family() isn't called. This issue exist since commit 46738b1317e1 ("ipv6: sr: add option to control lwtunnel support"), and commit 5559cea2d5aa ("ipv6: sr: fix possible use-after-free and null-ptr-deref") replaced unregister_pernet_subsys() with genl_unregister_family() in this error path.
CVE-2024-38623CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: fs/ntfs3: Use variable length array instead of fixed size Should fix smatch warning: ntfs_set_label() error: __builtin_memcpy() 'uni->name' too small (20 vs 256)
CVE-2021-47548CVSS 9.8In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ethernet: hisilicon: hns: hns_dsaf_misc: fix a possible array overflow in hns_dsaf_ge_srst_by_port() The if statement: if (port >= DSAF_GE_NUM) return; limits the value of port less than DSAF_GE_NUM (i.e., 8). However, if the value of port is 6 or 7, an array overflow could occur: port_rst_off = dsaf_dev->mac_cb[port]->port_rst_off; because the length of dsaf_dev->mac_cb is DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM (i.e., 6). To fix this possible array overflow, we first check port and if it is greater than or equal to DSAF_MAX_PORT_NUM, the function returns.

References

Track CVEs across your fleet automatically

Defensia scans your Linux servers and tells you exactly which ones are running vulnerable versions — including CVE-2024-50262. Free for 1 server.

Get started free